Up With Gravity<font size="1"><sup>SM</sup></font> Lesson 3 – Using your Center of Gravity when Sitting — 15 Comments

  1. Hi Robert, thank you for your wisdom – what about when driving a car? It looks like from your pictures here you don’t use any back rest when you sit. When you drive a car, however, you usually must at least have your lower back making contact with the seat for support, which I would assume raises your CG. Do you recommend any best way to find your CG when driving?

    (Would it even benefit with driving? Perhaps to help determine the optimum posture / seat height/length adjustments for longer drives)

    Do you recommend making this a habit – to always be conscious of your CG as one goes about his day?

    Thank you very much,


    • Great question Wes. You can certainly use the back rest and that doesn’t really change the seated CG significantly. I use it all the time when driving. (You might want to listen to some of the podcasts that deal with what will be in the third collection of written lessons – combing CG lifting with negative AT directions)

      As far as making it a habit, I’d go easy on yourself – a few times a day or so at first. Soon, you’ll probably find yourself using it more frequently.



  2. Thank you for these lessons. I have been researching the AT to see if I can align my posture and avoid pay in lower back. I have one shoulder a bit higher than the other and one hip is more developed than the other I sit squint and have slightly rounded shoulders, all things I want to correct.
    I followed your lessons and did find them helpful and easy to understand so I am grateful as I cannot afford to go to a practitioner even if I could find one here in Greece and who spoke English. I have send your link to my Mother as she is having problems with her balance at 87 years.

  3. Hi Robert, These are real nice straight-forward image exercises. I had no difficulty understanding or executing any of them. I have been playing with shifting the two locations of “center of gravity” to find where that point might tend to be for each of my type-specific imagery types.

    I don’t think that calling these points the “center of gravity” provides a complete or totally accurate description of what the points are. They might also be the “center of tensegrity,” meaning there is more involved than just hypothetical or even proven weight centers. To focus on any part of the body generally brings a bit of tension (not necessarily bad tension) to that spot. Where you think of something tends to tone it up temporarily. I think a bit of toning of the ventral surface takes place when we imagine our “center of gravity.”

    Thanks, I’ll send some people this way if I can.

    • Thanks for your comments John. I’d be interested in reading more about your point: “I don’t think that calling these points the “center of gravity” provides a complete or totally accurate description of what the points are.”

      Certainly the points may be more than just center of gravity, but from everything I know, they definitely are that.

      I’ll be interested in your take on the next set of lessons, coming soon, in which a lot more tension will be brought to bear on the center of gravity area.

      • Robert, I am finding trouble with the term “center of gravity” because I do not suspect it is a well defined as regards people. Does it mean center of weight distribution? I know that I have more weight above the center you describe than below. It is therefore a “center” in some other sense.

        The lower center of gravity that you describe seems to be the lower dan t’ien that is a focal point of mediations in t’ai chi and qigong. As focal points in these meditations, they promote “concentration” of mind (and the ventral surface) in that area. In that sense, it is a different sort of “center of gravity” of the body, one that is independent of our presence on an earth with its gravity.

        So, I see your exercises as more another discovery of the appropriate relationship of the dorsal to the ventral surface (and a valuable one, because of its simplicity).

        It might seem like I’m splitting hairs with your good work here… the exercises are great… but I don’t want to see the wrong explanation go with its effects.

        Linked here is a note and exercise that I posted on my Posture Release Imagery Facebook page a year and a half ago on two kinds of dorsal-ventral relationships … one I called Tai Chi body and the other “standing tall” body (which seems more AT-style to me). I was not as precise as your pinpointing of the “center of gravity” is, but in general, the concentration of the ventral surfaces comes close to your “center of gravity,” with the one which I call “standing tall” (the AT-style) points of concentration coming quite close to your concept of center of gravity.

        Thanks for the invitation to chat.

        • Hi John,

          The center of gravity is indeed the same as the dan t’ien point.

          The center of gravity of humans has been well documented and means the same as the center of gravity for any object. It reflects not just the amount of weight, say, above and below it, but it’s distribution – the weight further away has a bigger effect on its location than weight nearby. The effect of weight on the CG is proportional to the square of the distance away from the CG.

          The CG is the point at which gravity operates on the object, or in this case, the person – it’s what gravity “sees” when it sees you at any moment of time.

          BTW, the center of gravity can be outside your body at times – see the video at

          • Hi Robert,

            You make good points here. I guess I am only trying to suggest that another thing may be going on, as well, when a person imagines points within their body (or within their body then moving away from it). Within the body is mainly the domain of the ventral surface and focus on the points become focus on the ventral surface. But that is a bit complex to bring up here.

            Thanks and good work.

  4. Hi Robert,

    the idea of locating the,
    sitting centre of gravity and standing centre of gravity is very useful to use.

    But, I think seperating the ‘sitting centre of gravity ‘ and ‘standing centre of gravity ‘ as seperate entities not makes sense.

    And i believe thinking BOTH centre of gravities at a time ,one after the other all together in sit,stand activities gives a perfect reliable sense.

    What you think?

    • Certainly in moving from sitting to standing, it’s useful to start with the seated center of gravity and then shift to the overall one.
      And, yes, it can make sense to use both once you’ve become familiar with using them separately.

  5. Robert, whenever I’ve remembered to be aware of this center of gravity point (several times since reading your three lessons yesterday), everything shifts a bit for me, and I come into better balance. Such a simple idea, and so effective. Thank you! I’ve already used it to good effect with a student, who also liked the idea.

  6. Thank you very much indeed for these Up With Gravity 3 lessons, I found them so helpful and will definitely be introducing these to my clients during AT lessons. Another way of expanding awareness and applying constructive thought to our movements. Very much looking forward to further episodes!

  7. Hi Robert – thanks so much for this fascinating and useful series. N°3 is specially interesting, using the different seated CG. In N°2, as many people tend to be dragged forward and down by their pelvis (cowboy, model or just lazy walking), I think it’s important to make sure you “carry” the line/arrow/circle, and not let it “drag” you. Walking backwards directing the CG helps with this, I find. Looking forward to future episodes!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>